Retrospective · Fight: December 21, 2024 · Published:

Tyson Fury during a question-and-answer event in 2019
Archive photo of Tyson Fury from 2019, not this fight. Unmodified. ThorneySX · CC BY-SA 4.0.

The official finish

Oleksandr Usyk beat Tyson Fury by unanimous decision on December 21, 2024, at Kingdom Arena in Riyadh. All three judges scored the rematch 116-112. Usyk retained the WBC, WBA and WBO heavyweight championships; the IBF belt was no longer part of undisputed status. The WBC’s result report describes a tactical contest in which Usyk’s activity and left hand increasingly carried rounds. Three 116-112 cards supplied the agreement missing in May, but they do not mean every round was obvious. The consensus sits in the total: Usyk won enough exchanges and finishes to create the same margin for three judges. With no knockdown this time, the explanation depends more on sustained activity and less on one sequence dominating memory.

Why a second win changed the story

The first fight made Usyk the undisputed heavyweight champion; the second tested whether that narrow split decision was repeatable. Winning again, and unanimously, shifted the historical frame from upset or single-night drama toward sustained superiority across twenty-four rounds. It also strengthened Usyk’s unusual bridge between undisputed cruiserweight achievement and leadership of boxing’s largest traditional division. The first victory made Usyk undisputed; the second confirmed that he could repeat the solution against a much larger opponent. With the IBF title no longer involved, the exact achievement was retaining the WBC, WBA and WBO belts. For Fury, another loss closed the immediate route to calling the split decision an accident and moved his future beyond an automatic rematch.

Reading control, not just size

Fury’s dimensions can make every exchange look like a geometry problem, but size alone does not establish control. Usyk’s value lay in entering, scoring and resetting before Fury could dictate comfortably. Fury still had productive stretches, especially with the jab and body work. The 116-112 consensus is official, not mathematical proof that every close round had only one reasonable interpretation. With no knockdown in the rematch, comparison must be built round by round. Record the clean actions scored, when distance changes and who finishes each exchange, but do not presume that jabs, body work, entries or exits explain the result. Three 116-112 cards are verifiable; the route to them should be observed, not asserted without sourcing.

The rewatch question

Compare this bout with the first without copying the card. In every round, record whether Fury's jab creates offense or merely buys time. For Usyk, count entries that end in a safe exit. Hide the 116-112 total until the end and decide whether all three judges reached the same margin through the same rounds or different routes. The repeated official margin gives the rematch a firmer result than the split decision, although it still leaves individual close rounds open to reasoned disagreement.

Sources

Interested in training at TNT? Explore boxing classes in San José del Cabo.

Let’s talk on WhatsAppExplore the full journal